Most autistic bloggers may need to identify their independence in a disclaimer to prevent the significant or (as I've heard them called recently, the "influential") advocates from needing to remind readers, in case they're too familiar and inconvenient to ignore. This restriction prohibits diversity by assigning shame to the individual and prevents comprehensive understanding of anything but what ...a few more aggressive/ might-is-right-er /professionals believe and declare factual. Of course, attacking those who question policy is easier than reviewing it.
It's unfortunate these restrictions are enforced. Of course, each individual (more commonly referred to as an individualist) will be personally blamed by behaviorists/ advocates for having a poor attitude along with other character flaws and be punished accordingly. The intimidation is quite effective and unfortunately this is what the politicians attempt to justify as pragmatism. It's practical for them that everyone be viewed as wanting the same thing so each can be compared and ranked. They will always describe the system as fair since to them the requirements were convenient. Maybe someday Autism Speaks will be replaced by another group, which is equally harmful.
As Noam Chomsky said. “The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum....”
It's unfortunate these restrictions are enforced. Of course, each individual (more commonly referred to as an individualist) will be personally blamed by behaviorists/ advocates for having a poor attitude along with other character flaws and be punished accordingly. The intimidation is quite effective and unfortunately this is what the politicians attempt to justify as pragmatism. It's practical for them that everyone be viewed as wanting the same thing so each can be compared and ranked. They will always describe the system as fair since to them the requirements were convenient. Maybe someday Autism Speaks will be replaced by another group, which is equally harmful.
As Noam Chomsky said. “The smart way to keep people passive and obedient is to strictly limit the spectrum of acceptable opinion, but allow very lively debate within that spectrum....”
No comments:
Post a Comment